Day of the ‘Stache
Last week I asked which Machine Man cover concept
you liked best. And there were all kinds of opinions. But once I
nerded up and crunched the numbers*,
it became clear. You like the ‘stache.
Here are the covers in question. If you’re not seeing a graph, try this. If you are, and you enjoy playing with graphs, you can click site names in the legend to add and remove them. I mention that because it’s awesome fun.
I separated votes by domain because there were interesting differences depending on whether you responded on my site, Reddit, tumblr, or Facebook.
Observations:
- In all cases, Cover #5 (Victorian-era dude with enormous ‘stache) was most popular. This was a surprise because I’d thought it was just too weird. In retrospect, I was probably headed for that trap of trying to imagine what other people might like, which is always a sure path to something conservative and uninteresting. So this was a handy reminder to not do that. Many people responded very positively to the originality of this design and were turned off by the same-ness of some others.
- Cover #3 (Millions o’ Parts) was least popular. This was lucky, because it was the design that started this whole debate with my publisher, and if it turned out that people actually liked it best, I would have been an asshole. The votes also seemed to back up my thesis that it appealed more to arty types than geeks, with it being quite popular on tumblr but abhorred on Reddit (where there were actually more negative comments than positive ones).
- Covers #4 (Smoking Capacitor) and #6 (Smoking Processor), which were deliberately similar to the style of my previous covers in Jennifer Government and Company, were a lot more popular with people who knew that (i.e. people on maxbarry.com and my Facebook page).
- Reddit liked Cover #2 (the Robot) a great deal, practically as much as the ‘Stache. I suspect this is due to an affection for retro robots (something I share). A few people observed that it was less true to the story than #5, though.
- Cover #1 (Pixelated Guy) I think suffered from a general feeling that this kind of thing had been done before. It was seen as pleasant but not particularly arresting.
If you were wondering, covers #3 and #6 were designed by Vintage, cover #4 by me, and covers #1, #2, and #5 by up-and-coming design superstar Matt Roeser. I didn’t mention that earlier to avoid prejudicing votes.
Comment of the week, from G Lainagier:
In numerical order: Couplandesque cubicle farce, Rankinesque steampunk, Kathy Lette tries something new, Tom Clancy for the kids of today, what you wrote, what you might write but not really this.
I also enjoyed seeing Caleb’s battle against indecision, as he transitioned over the course of three comments and several hours from saying #6 was terrible to liking it the best.
I forgot to mention earlier that most of these covers were concept sketches, not finalized designs. With #5, for example, a few people criticized the machine legs, which were only supposed to be placeholders. I’m now working with Matt and the publisher to refine that. I promise you, those legs will be awesome. Also: the ‘stache stays.
Thank you again to everyone who helped out with this. You are the burning propulsive mass beneath my rocket boots.
* Nerd details: I assigned a weighting to expressed preferences: 3 points for most preferred, 2 points for any second preference, down to -2 for last preference, if one was mentioned. When people said they liked multiple things equally, I alternated entering them in the order listed or in reverse. To allow opinions on different sites to be compared, despite very different numbers of respondents (about 260 on maxbarry.com, 390 on Reddit plus a thousand-odd votes, 70 on tumblr, and 50 on Facebook), I scaled the results: the most popular choice is scored as 1,000 and other covers based on their relative popularity on that site. A cover exactly half as popular as the top choice, for example, on whichever site, has a column exactly half as tall. Note that this exaggerates a single person’s vote on Facebook and tumblr: the Reddit and maxbarry.com columns represent many more people’s opinions.
On Reddit, where users can endorse another person’s comment by upvoting it, I multiplied the score of each comment by the number of upvotes. But since users can upvote multiple comments, even comments saying the same thing, I took the square root of each result in order to minimize the exaggeration that would have otherwise occurred. (Without this, the more popular covers on Reddit appeared wildly more popular.) When highly upvoted comments expressed equal preferences for multiple covers, I assigned equal scores, rather than relying on the averaging nature of the alternating system mentioned earlier.
Comments
This is where site members post comments. If you're not a member, you can join here. There are all kinds of benefits, including moral superiority!
Location: the Stygian Empire
Quote: "Flesh is a design flaw."
Posted: 5094 days ago
shabooty (#637)
Location: D.C./V.A/M.D.
Quote: "I will shake your foundation. I will shake the f**cking rafters. Nobody'll be the same -Danny Bonaduce ....& go visit my blog @: http://www.shabooty.com"
Posted: 5094 days ago
b) got damn you're good at math. i thought writers sucked with numbers.
c) whatever happened to just eye-balling it? :)
d) i hate people who can write words and calculate numbers equally well.
Posted: 5094 days ago
Damn math.
Interesting observation of how opinions varied from site to site. In hindsight though, it should have been obvious 'Stache Man would win.
Billy McMahon (#4690)
Location: Variable
Quote: "revolution"
Posted: 5094 days ago
At least the legs are changing. I'll be getting the book anyway.
stanley becker (#5283)
Location: black hole
Quote: "DON"T JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER!!"
Posted: 5094 days ago
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote: "I'm my number one fan!"
Posted: 5094 days ago
Location: the Stygian Empire
Quote: "Flesh is a design flaw."
Posted: 5094 days ago
Location: USA
Quote: "What unseen pen etched eternal things in the hearts of humankind... but never let them in our minds?"
Posted: 5094 days ago
I still like #3, in terms of character of the book (the daily book version, that is), but that was a tough choice for me over #5 and that was based on #5's legs not being good. So, when you change them, I may decide I like #5 better than #3. And I'm glad you're keeping the 'stache... that's definitely a great part of it.
Simon (#3192)
Location: Melbourne
Quote: "I'd rather be arrogant than wrong"
Posted: 5094 days ago
Stasey Norstrom (#4989)
Location: The Yanqui Northwest
Quote: ""Alice was tired of being dead." - Wonderland"
Posted: 5094 days ago
I still think #3 was the best choice for non-fans of yours.
But I'm just one of those arty types. Damn artists.
Grant Henninger (#5430)
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posted: 5094 days ago
Location: Canada
Posted: 5094 days ago
Oh yeah, and reading your analysis and explanation of methods used made me a bit... is there a polite term for horny? Horny for science.
Okay, I'm going now.
Location: Heist, Belgium
Quote: "he reads things"
Posted: 5093 days ago
;)
It's a shame #1 didn't win, but that won't stop me from buying Machine Man immediately when I can!
Location: new york general sort of vicinity
Quote: ""It's not working" -- Joseph Clark"
Posted: 5093 days ago
The opening with its use of "expressed preferences" & "weighting" made it sound like Max just counted votes he liked more because he liked the votes
Next, I like the idea of "liked multiple things equally" had a curious zen-like quality to it and almost made sense. But then the part about counting those votes alternately made it sound like he was counting "1, 2, 3" and then "3, 2, 1" ... That's still 3 numbers, right?
I really like the use of a total score of 1,000 because 100 has less zeroes and it's just so "percent" sounding. We've all seen the percent thing so many times. Brilliant Max.
But my favorite is the part about Reddit. The use of the term "upvoting" without the quotes reflects a respect of the reader's awareness of the Reddit's system. Further the italics on "multiple" helped comprehension. And finally applying the square root to the equation topped off the whole sequence. I have no idea why the square root would be applied except that whenever the phrase is used in any discussion regarding numbers it brings the expression to another level entirely.
Whatever happens If the publisher doesn't eat this stuff up, they should go back to business school.
ryandake (#2199)
Location: scenic monterey, ca
Quote: ""The rest is not our business.""
Posted: 5093 days ago
how'd you do that? inquiring geeks want to know.
Gregory (#1530)
Location: Forest Hill
Quote: "I think therefore I am, I think"
Posted: 5093 days ago
Do you actually think we believer you?
After the FIFA World Cup debacle, the corruption of the Eurovision voting and Collingwood being robbed by the umpires? Thsi has the hallmarks of Roswell all over again.
Location: Ravena, NY
Quote: "I could write a book about being lazy. I just don't feel like it."
Posted: 5093 days ago
Brittany O. (#1688)
Location: Montana
Quote: "people are kind of overrated "
Posted: 5093 days ago
They say people judge books by their covers. I love the cleanness of the all white cover with one catchy object, not #6.
Brittany O. (#1688)
Location: Montana
Quote: "people are kind of overrated "
Posted: 5093 days ago
Location: chattanooga, TN, USA
Quote: """
Posted: 5092 days ago
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posted: 5092 days ago
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote: "I'm my number one fan!"
Posted: 5092 days ago
@coolpillows: You're teasing me but I can't help it. The square root is helpful because of this: say there were 10 Redditors and 7 liked Cover A best and 3 liked cover B best. If I'm accurately measuring that situation, I should find that 70% prefer A and 30% prefer B. But since on Reddit you can both post a comment and upvote everyone who agrees with you, there may be 7 comments saying A, each with 7 votes, and 3 comments saying B, each with 3 votes. That looks like A wins 49 points (7x7) to 9 pts (3x3), or 84% to 16%, which is exaggerated. Taking the square root brings it back to 7 vs 3. That's an idealized example but a fair approximation of what happens on Reddit, I think.
@ryandake: I made the graph with Highcharts www.highcharts.com. I bought a license to use on NationStates a while ago. Because it's sexy.
@tim: Yep, it's a paperback original. The hardcover/paperback thing has pros and cons. HC has more prestige and is sometimes essential in order to get reviewed, PB sells more copies (because it's cheaper). Often genre stuff comes out in PB and literary stuff in HC. In this case the publisher felt it would work better as in paperback. I'm not exactly sure why. But hopefully it means the book can sell strongly and even poor college students can afford it.
stanley becker (#5283)
Location: black hole
Quote: "DON"T JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER!!"
Posted: 5092 days ago
ryandake (#2199)
Location: scenic monterey, ca
Quote: ""The rest is not our business.""
Posted: 5091 days ago
Celeste (#2590)
Location: St.L. MO, USA
Quote: "You can't child-proof the world, so world-proof the child."
Posted: 5089 days ago
You're on Facebook? I need to go friend you now. And, oh, amazing author of the Near Future who wrote an online book that is now going to be available on paper: Is it going to be available on Nook? My plans for the future Including owning less physical objects: but if I own a Nook, I dont have to stop acquiring books- and I want to acquire all of yours. Just checking them out from the library is not enough.
stanley becker (#5283)
Location: black hole
Quote: "DON"T JUDGE A BOOK BY ITS COVER!!"
Posted: 5089 days ago
Regards S.
Morrison (#5340)
Location: Europe
Posted: 5076 days ago
Comments are now closed for this post.