Vote 1 Whoever Has The Ugliest Vice
I
just noticed that a strong candidate in the race for next President of the United States is
Fred Thompson. Fred played the District Attorney on Law & Order, and has
acted in movies and TV shows as a Senator, Director of the CIA, White House Chief of Staff, an admiral, and, indeed, the President.
Now, let me be clear: the US is the world’s leading light when it comes to freedom and democracy. Anybody who disagrees deserves the wiretappings, slur campaigns, arrest, and/or bombings they get. But come on: Fred Thompson? Isn’t that purely because people will think, “Yeah, he seems like he should be in a position of authority… for… some… reason.”
I have trouble with the whole idea of actors as politicians. We’re electing someone whose primary skill is pretending. Maybe it’s just me, but a guy who has spent most of his life honing the ability to lie convincingly; that makes me uncomfortable. Electing that guy seems to say, “Look, we don’t care what you get up to. Just make sure you look earnest about it.”
I understand a little. After all, we’ve all got to look at whoever gets elected for the next four years. They might as well be pretty. Then there are those international conferences, where the leaders of multiple countries get together to usher in new eras of co-operation and outsourcing. Sometimes they wear funny shirts. You can’t send some shy, weedy nerd to that. Well, you can. Australia does. But it’s embarrassing. You know if Arnold Schwarzenegger was President, he might be a policy disaster but America would look totally rocking in the APEC group photo. And while I’m not totally sure how these international agreements get formed, physicality has to be involved to some degree. I’m not saying they decide carbon emissions targets by sealing the doors, stripping to the waist, and grappling for supremacy. There’s no way Bush could have taken Schroeder. That man is huge. But maybe late in the day, when everyone’s tired, having Schwarzenegger plant his ham-sized fists on France’s desk could close the deal.
The ideal, then, must be job-sharing. You have a strong, good-looking President to shake hands at the UN, and a smart, ugly President to stay home and make the tough decisions. Americans have clearly figured this out already, and it explains Bush-Cheney. And why Kerry lost in 2004: he’s got a face like his pet hamster just died, while his running mate, Edwards, is too good-looking. You’d worry that Edwards would be at a tanning salon while Britain and France were sniggering at mean drawings of Kerry during his speech at G8. That ticket just didn’t make sense.
The more physically attractive the President, the uglier the Vice should be, to compensate. It’s the Conservation of Beauty principle.
Now Harrison Ford and Alan Greenspan: that would be a hot ticket. You wouldn’t even have to know their policies. You would just look at that coupling of Ford’s wild charisma with a guy as old as God and something inside you would click.
Comments
This is where site members post comments. If you're not a member, you can join here. There are all kinds of benefits, including moral superiority!
Joe (#2270)
Location: Campbell, CA, USA
Quote: "I'm subverting the system from the inside. I think."
Posted: 6398 days ago
He's embarrassingly bad when he has to think on his feet; he practically looks senile. He's dumb and ugly. But he does have a hot trophy wife, who's half his age.
Douglas Bushong (#44)
Location: America (Virginia)
Quote: "When you are trying to teach someone a new job, it's best to just throw them into the fire and beat them. They'll get sharp or they'll break. Either way, you won't waste precious time teaching them a job that they aren't meant to do."
Posted: 6398 days ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Thompson
I only mention this because I really like your blog, and I hate to see someone slamming people for inappropriate reasons. If Tom Selleck or Martin Sheen ran for office, I could see this argument, but Fred Thompson has some chops in Washington.
That said, I get the point of the blog. Personally, the only thing that I can say about Fred Thompson's politics is that I don't know anything about Fred Thompson's politics. I do find it frustrating when I see people cheering for him even though they don't know is politics either. They hear the slight southern accent, the matter-of-fact tone, and think "I should follow that guy."
lyssabits (#1444)
Location: San Francisco, CA
Quote: ""Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.""
Posted: 6398 days ago
Adam (#580)
Location: Hotel Lobbies (with Winona Ryder)
Quote: "I want to be famous. Really famous."
Posted: 6398 days ago
So, Fred, ol' buddy, lose the politician bit and keep riding the dead cowboy train straight on till Morning in America.
Thomas (#1221)
Location: Germany
Quote: "One more, and I'm going to consider you my penpal."
Posted: 6398 days ago
Admittedly, his head is huge. But... I think you could take him.
Yenzo (#829)
Location: Secret underwater pyramid base in the Pacific
Quote: "In order to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe (Carl Sagan)"
Posted: 6398 days ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helmut_Kohl
That guy's as big as a house. I think he became chancellor by threatening people that he would literally eat them. And people were so afraid that they kept him in office for 16 years.
Apart from that, determining international policies by physical combat is always a good idea. Isn't that how the Japanese parliament does it?
Adam A. (#256)
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Quote: "Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that." -George Carlin"
Posted: 6397 days ago
You've got it right about Cheney being the brains behind Bush's good-ole boy, simpleton persona. Too bad he uses his smarts for evil, though.
Linnea1928 (#2654)
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posted: 6397 days ago
Sorry for the lecture, but as I was just visiting Washington, DC for the weekend, I am kinda full up on the political stuff.
austin (#2462)
Location: rhode island
Quote: "hmmm...bleh..."
Posted: 6397 days ago
Flynn (#520)
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Quote: "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by."
Posted: 6397 days ago
BTW, thankfully, Schwartzenegger can't be president, he's not a natural born citizen. However, it is funny that every once in a while when someone pops up in a party who's a good candidate but not born here, <A HREF="http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/02/22/elec04.prez.schwarzenegger.ap/index.html">someone in Congress muses about changing that law</A>.
Flynn (#520)
Location: Chicago, IL USA
Quote: "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by."
Posted: 6397 days ago
Melvin Smiley (#3200)
Location: Germany
Quote: ""Life is nasty and it seemed pointless to say so!""
Posted: 6397 days ago
Maybe you, but not science. In 1970 Dr. Myron L. Fox held a lecture about "Mathematical Game Theory as Applied to Physician Education," which was very well received by his listeners (all participants of the University of Southern California School of Medicine's educational programme). After one hour lecture he answered questions.
The only problem with Myron L. Fox was the fact, that he wasn't a doctor, didn't know anything about game theory. He was an actor who read an article concerning the topic, made up his speach consisting of "double talk, neologisms, non sequiturs, and contradictory statements interspersed with parenthetical humor and meaningless references to unrelated topics."
Even after the scenario was uncovered some of the audiance asked about further reading. sciencethatmatters.com/archives/17
So if medical personal learns more from actors than from actual medics, maybe actors also govern better. And if not it would at least be more entertaining.
Location: Canada
Posted: 6397 days ago
And you had no problem with Max discussing, for a laugh, someone chopping up and cooking three women? Which certainly isn't funny to read when you're their relatives stumbling over this blog? Funny priorities you have there, Linnea.
Tim (#3178)
Posted: 6397 days ago
John Wilkes Booth made the argument for actors as assassins. Which is part of the reason why I'm keeping my eye on Ann Heche.
Tim (#3178)
Posted: 6397 days ago
There are some critics who put down programs like "The Daily Show" (is there a version of the show that airs in Australia?) and "The Colbert Report" because, they argue, they encourage apathy and a lack of seriousness about the political process. As if satire and seriousness were somehow mutually exclusive. Aren't our brains capable of juggling both? Can't both inform the other? In a lot of ways, I think a sense of humor about a subject can lend not only valuable perspective but also an energizing sense of empowerment.
Just because you laugh or even mock something upon occasion doesn't mean you can't also be seriously engaged in it as well. As they cliche goes, sometimes if you don't laugh, you'll cry.
Talking about lectures and earnestness. I totally ruined the joke of my last post.
Brenng (#3235)
Location: UK (sitting down)
Quote: "Laugh when all the world cries and they'll lock you up for being an antisocial freak. www.brennigjones.com - there's a laugh in there somewhere!"
Posted: 6394 days ago
Julia Roberts to sell the soap and Buffy the Vamipire Slayer to do the arse kicking!
I'd vote for that combination. If I could vote in America.
:-)
Location: Sydney
Quote: "vote with your wallet"
Posted: 6389 days ago
nohah! (#3330)
Posted: 6389 days ago
Sophie (#891)
Location: Devon
Posted: 6388 days ago
Comments are now closed for this post.