Get feedback
Now a community service announcement. If you’re a Struggling
Writer (TM) looking for ways to improve, head straight for
the recently-revamped
Internet
Writing Workshop.
Or, possibly, read the rest of this blog, then head on over.
That might make more sense.
The toughest thing about writing a novel is the loss of perspective. For me, the process usually goes like this:
- Hey, what a great idea for a book! This will rock!
- This story is going gangbusters. Look at all these plot threads unfolding!
- I should really start to tie some of these plot threads together.
- Okay, now which threads are important and which aren’t? What is this book really about?
- What makes a good story? Why do human beings read books?
- What is the meaning of life?
- Boo boo boo boo boo boo.
The best antidote to this is feedback. Or maybe therapy, but I’ve never tried that. Feedback allows you to view your story through the eyes of someone reading it for the first time, something you the author can never do. When I get good feedback, I weep with joy, and the realization that I need to do three months of rewrites.
But there are two big problems with feedback:
- Some people are insane. They tell you to change all the good parts of your book, and set it in space. Since you have no perspective, it’s difficult to tell these people are insane; you can think they’re really insightful.
- It’s embarrassing, at least for people who haven’t done it very much. Writers are often touchy about receiving feedback, and readers know this so they’re careful about giving it. The result is feedback like: “I liked everything.” Which is nice to hear, but completely useless. Or even harmful, if it prevents you from seeing problems that need fixing.
The Internet Writing Workshop solves both of these problems. First, you get lots of feedback, possibly a dozen or so quick critiques, and this makes insane opinions stand out. When ten people tell you they love your main character and one person says you should rewrite him as a woman, you know you can safely ignore that person, and everything he ever says.
Second, everything is via e-mail, so you don’t have to look any weepy-eyed writers in the face as you critically dissect their masterpieces. And they don’t have to look at you, so the feedback you get is honest and free of any reflex need to soothe your feelings. This doesn’t mean you’ll always agree with it, but it will give you that invaluable glimpse of your own book through someone else’s eyes.
The IWW is completely free, being run by hard-working and soft-hearted volunteers. I used it all the time when I was starting out, and it made me a better writer.
Comments
This is where site members post comments. If you're not a member, you can join here. There are all kinds of benefits, including moral superiority!
Location: Lorne, Vic
Posted: 7466 days ago
Jim Carson (#231)
Location: Seattle
Quote: "Coca Cola announced a mid-calorie cola named C2, ostensibly to compete with Pepsi "Edge." It's billed as a solution to the low-carb dieters who have been marooned on the distant asteroid where Diet Coke is unavailable."
Posted: 7466 days ago
It also helps IWW reviewers if you provide some context (especially for the shorter, non-fiction pieces) like who your intended audience is, whether your piece is an excerpt and what kind of feedback are you looking for.
Jim Carson
http://www.jimcarson.com
Location: Lorne, Vic
Posted: 7465 days ago
Scott (#354)
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Quote: "Max Barry tastes like awesome"
Posted: 7462 days ago
Dan (#1004)
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote: ""Another day in paradise. Wish I were there...""
Posted: 7413 days ago
Given: A picture is worth a thousand words.
Given: The camera adds ten pounds.
Do the math... three words comes out to around 13.7 grams. Doesn't matter the length of the word.
So why then, (Max, (Maxx, if you prefer) maybe you can help me here) given that all words weigh the same, they can impact so much more or less than others. It's because they have different mass.
Any three words, 13.7 grams. Telling someone, "Eat more fish" weighs less than a small caliber bullet. But saying "I love you" or I hate you" ...weighs the same. Meaning it, however... can do more damage than an exploding hydrogen bomb.
Because the mass of the words is different.
My gripe about writers is that they put too much credence in the weight of their words, but pay no attention to the mass.
Max, as for you... You've done well by me. You give a good read, but if the person wants to get more out of a story than just that, they can. Almost like Heinlein. He never wrote anything without actually saying something else, underneath all the storytelling.
He also won more Hugo awards than anyone else to date.
So keep it up!
P.S. ...Max: regarding Heinlein... I never wrote him a letter, he died in 1988. Even so, glad my letters didn't kill you (yeah, I'm that guy) although I'm not quite ready to write someone else for fear that you were just a fluke. Talk about words with critical mass... Hmm, Adams, Asimov...maybe it's just authors whose last name begins with "A". ...hmm
Brandon R. Holgersen (#1043)
Location: Okinawa
Posted: 7401 days ago
Comments are now closed for this post.