Maximum Words. Maximum Results. Maximum Barry.
(Gahh! I wrote most of this blog, then got sick. It was
the usual. But I’m better now,
thanks for asking.)
Some people recommend that you write a certain number of words every day. Well, not you, necessarily. Novelists. See, those of us who decided it was a good idea to write a novel sometimes find that our key challenge has become not drawing heart-breakingly realistic characters or identifying our underlying unifying theme, but rather getting to the end of the frickin’ thing before we die.
Novels are long. You probably don’t realize how long until you write one. Occasionally I hear that someone read one of my books in some ridiculous amount of time, like a single night, or half a day while sipping coffee in Barnes & Noble, or while waiting in line at a movie, and this is wonderful but also appalling, because people really shouldn’t be allowed to digest a couple of years’ worth of my work that fast. They should have to work at it, like I did. It’s only fair.
But the point is: if a writer isn’t careful (or if he is; if he is too careful), he can find himself with a reasonable amount of pages but no enthusiasm to write any more.
The minimum-number-of-words-per-day technique is meant to help. It’s practiced by successful authors and advocated by admirable organizations, and for many people, it clearly works.
But for me, it’s a disaster. I tried it in 1998, after I’d finished Syrup but before I’d found a publisher. I was starting a book called Paper Warfare, a fairly straight corporate thriller about tobacco marketing, and I was very disciplined; every day for weeks I pounded out my minimum 2,000 words. But it felt wrong, because I knew that some days I was just banging out words so I could close the goddamn word processor and go do something else. The next day, I’d try to avoid looking at the words, because if I did I would be so appalled that I would have to delete them. This didn’t seem very efficient. And, more importantly, I wasn’t enjoying it: writing had become a chore.
I made it all the way to the book’s climax—I even had the ending plotted out—then realized it sucked. Not just a little. Not in ways that could be fixed. The whole book really, really blew.
Since then, I’ve written exactly as many words per day as I feel like. And that’s worked well, because when I’m having fun, I’m usually producing good words. But for the book I’m working on now, I’m trying something new: a maximum number of words per day.
I had something like this when I wrote Syrup, because I wrote during my lunch breaks at Hewlett-Packard: I had one hour to eat, write, and get back to pretending that I knew what SCSI interfaces were. Often I would be forced to leave half-way through a great scene, even though I was chafing to finish it. During the rest of those days I would keep thinking about the book, and come up with little embellishments and new ideas. Next lunch time, I would cram down my chicken sandwiches so I could get to writing as soon as possible.
I think this is pretty close to the perfect state: unable to write quite as much as I want to. So I’m seeing if I can create it artificially.
So far it’s been hard, because when I’m on a roll, I really don’t want to stop. I find myself deliberately avoiding doing a word count, because I know I’m probably already over. (I have set my maximum low: just 500 words per day.) Stopping before I want to is frustrating. But then, that’s the idea. I should finish each day a little frustrated.
You will know if this technique is working, because my blogs will become much longer, as I seek outlets for my pent-up words. Yes. You will be my hookers.
Comments
This is where site members post comments. If you're not a member, you can join here. There are all kinds of benefits, including moral superiority!
Kori (#2258)
Location: Rochester, MN
Quote: "And then Jesus said, 'Let them eat cake.'"
Posted: 6911 days ago
Andrew (#1279)
Location: Texas
Posted: 6911 days ago
Phill Sacre (#1822)
Location: London, UK
Quote: "Computers are like air conditioners. Both stop working, if you open windows."
Posted: 6911 days ago
Which kind of complements what you said, Max - you need to just give yourself time to think about what you're writing :-)
Narain (#824)
Location: Los Angeles, right between civilization and a desert
Quote: "NI!"
Posted: 6911 days ago
Alan Barclay (#1701)
Location: Seattle
Quote: "http://www.alanbarclay.com"
Posted: 6911 days ago
As well as the excitement of stopping while still energetic and on a roll, a set period also heads off overwhelming thoughts like "I should use every free hour to write."
I recommend this thought and others like it if you want to drive yourself into paralysis. Putting a cap on my writing heads this off and I write more in the long run.
(PS: Gee when I was growing up a tonsilectomy was supposed to _reduce_ infections. Glad I never had it done. Sorry, you did, Max.)
Rod McBride (#688)
Location: Gardner, KS
Quote: "www.MidwestRockLobster.blogspot.com"
Posted: 6911 days ago
I suspect that's also what he loves so much about using an old fashioned Selectric instead of a word processor. Having to bother with all the stuff a word processor frees you from, and not having, for instance, a word counter to distract you.
I think some people I know would like it if I had a maximum word count, a verbal limit on how long I am allowed to ramble about stuff...
Justin Holt (#147)
Location: Rochester, NY
Quote: "www.justinholt.net"
Posted: 6911 days ago
as for the writing per day thing, i have tried it both ways, the way that stephen king advocates in his 'on writing' book, and the way of waiting around for inspiration to set in. i remember someone asking chuck palahniuk at the postcards from the future conference if he did the per day self deadline thing and his response was, 'do you sit down to take a shit if you don't have to?' personally, i always found that the one resounding plus of doing the word per day thing isn't neccesarily the writing itself, but rather the ideas within the writing. some good stuff comes out when you don't allow your mind the time to censor it. even if the writing is crap, which a lot of times it is, most of the time it seems there are at least a couple of parts that, if they don't blow you away, at least make you say, 'well this isn't complete crap. maybe i've got something here.' then again, that could just be me.
Peter Baker (#475)
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Quote: "I reject your reality and substitute my own."
Posted: 6911 days ago
Nora Jean Stone (#1170)
Location: San Francisco, CA, USA
Quote: "Do Wa Ditty, Life in the CITY, where the Women are Strong and the Men are Pretty... anon"
Posted: 6911 days ago
I read once that Ernest Hemingway would write each morning before his children woke up. He would read everything that was written and then progress. He was said to have stopped writing the day before on a line he knew how he would end, in a paragraph he knew how he would end, in a chapter he knew how he would end. That way after reading everything he wrote from the beginning he could progress to that point, where he knew were he was going.
But he also shot himself, so I don't know how good that writing technique might be for others.
All I know is if something that is a creative effort turns into being a chore, that's the time to step back and reconsider the process. I know I wrote my best poems and short stories when I was working in a government printing warehouse, where my brain wasn't being used for any higher function than moving my hands collating that which others had written... badly.
Christian (#2192)
Location: Calgary, Canada
Quote: "If being a nerd was baseball, I'd be starting quarterback!"
Posted: 6911 days ago
And I love it!
Katy (#2345)
Location: Los Angeles
Posted: 6911 days ago
I am not interested in a career as a writer, but I am trying to write a story. I stopped about two months ago and don't think I'll start again.
I was making myself write every night before I went to sleep (I have a spare laptop: what better use to put it to?) and... I'm not very inspired by the time I finally get to bed every day. It was a nice thought, but my writing came out sounding affected with a hint of pretentious (very similar to that last sentence, only chapters of it).
Hm. Another bad idea. Writing at night...
Bad.
And sorry about the long post; it's morning. I guess this should be my time of day to write (type).
Location: Morristown, Indiana
Quote: "Why do I blog? Simple, because Max Barry blogs."
Posted: 6911 days ago
Yeah...I write a maximum of twenty words per day. It's not really working out.
-adam
Michael (#1299)
Location: Northern California
Quote: "Chugachugachoochoo"
Posted: 6911 days ago
Tim Ashwood (#595)
Location: Sydney
Posted: 6911 days ago
If I don't feel like writing, it's TV or DVD or the other blackhole of time - editing.
And re-editing.
And again.
No, wait - that was better the other way.
Dumbass, no it wasn't, put it back.
Crap. I'm bored with this - get back to progressing the story - "she heard the crunch of gravel behind her, but maintained her steady walking pace while wrapping her fingers around the hilt of the knife. Whoever it was, if they came too close, would get a nasty surprise..."
Keely (#1602)
Location: easy-peasy-24.livejournal.com of course!
Quote: "I always wanted to see the lights of Broadway... but then you get there and they're really kind of annoying."
Posted: 6911 days ago
I dunno--that's just the way I function. Maybe if it was my job, and I was out of school already, it'd be different...
Richard (#2051)
Location: Boulder, CO
Quote: "...I may not like you, but because some town in Switzerland says so, you have rights!"
Posted: 6911 days ago
Tony Quin (#1310)
Location: Plymouth -urgh
Quote: "Yoga is NAILS"
Posted: 6910 days ago
Jeffrey (#2286)
Location: Right here
Quote: "Mathematics is a powerful language. Just look at how mathematicians destroyed the housing market."
Posted: 6910 days ago
Location: Sydney, Australia
Quote: "Why are the pretty ones always insane?"
Posted: 6910 days ago
John Doe (#797)
Location: Live from Omicron Persei 8
Quote: "You're just jealous because the little voices only talk to me."
Posted: 6910 days ago
2) We have that same problem in software development. Creating something takes an inordinate amount of time, compared to the amount of time users actually spend with it. You might spend days designing and implementing something that most users won't even notice, or will go through in seconds. The thing that saves me is that I love programming. If I were to worry about the outcome too much, or about how I'm spending a third of my life writing stuff that becomes obsolete almost as soon as it's ready, I might lose it.
The best explanation I've read on this thus far was in Flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. If you want to be happy, you need to be involved in enjoyable activities. If you want activities to be enjoyable, you need, among other things, to make sure you're performing them for their intrinsic values.
Picto (#64)
Location: United Kingdom
Quote: "Who is more foolish, the child afraid of the dark or the man afraid of the light? - Maurice Freehill"
Posted: 6910 days ago
Trespassers Will (#2174)
Location: Puyallup, WA
Quote: ""...and if I laugh at any mortal thing, 'tis that I may not weep" - Lord Byron"
Posted: 6910 days ago
Hang in there.
Coley (#2323)
Location: USA
Quote: "I was walking home one night and a guy hammering on a roof called me a paranoid little weirdo. In morse code"
Posted: 6909 days ago
Michael (#1299)
Location: Northern California
Quote: "Chugachugachoochoo"
Posted: 6908 days ago
Oodge (#2790)
Location: Tas
Quote: "'Ooh look Marge, Maggie lost her baby legs.'"
Posted: 6686 days ago
by the way Max, thanks for the hooker comment
John (#2879)
Location: UK
Quote: "Minging sum ne"
Posted: 6656 days ago
(Of course, introducing the risk of killing your prose's spirit!)
But you never mentioned it, so I wonder whether it's a factor?
Comments are now closed for this post.